The world’s most precious stones are being transformed into tools for climate change mitigation and conservation, from geoengineering with diamond dust to lab-grown diamonds fueling sustainable industries.
Diamonds, long symbols of opulence and love, are finding new relevance in an unexpected domain: combating climate change. As the planet grapples with rising temperatures and ecological risks — many of them tied to the mining industry — scientists and innovators are exploring how mined and lab-grown diamonds might contribute to global conservation and sustainability.
Recent research suggests that diamond dust may hold the key to mitigating climate change by reflecting solar energy away from Earth. According to scientists at ETH Zurich, injecting 5.5 million tons of diamond dust annually into the stratosphere could lower global temperatures by 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit. This intervention could counteract nearly all warming attributed to human activity since the Industrial Revolution.
This method, known as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), builds on observations of cooling effects following major volcanic eruptions. Unlike sulfur dioxide, which has been previously studied for SAI but carries risks of disrupting atmospheric circulation and precipitation patterns, diamonds offer a cleaner alternative.
Sandro Vattioni, a researcher in experimental atmospheric physics at ETH Zurich, emphasized the unique advantages of diamonds in this context. “We just looked at diamonds, and we didn’t think about costs or how these particles could be mined,” Vattioni said in a statement. “But obviously these are also questions that need to be considered [to determine] if it’s feasible or not to do something like this.”
Synthetic diamonds, rather than mined ones, would likely be used for this purpose due to cost considerations. The researchers found that diamonds are three times more efficient than materials like aluminum and calcite at achieving the same cooling effect. Additionally, diamond dust avoids the stratospheric warming issues associated with other aerosols.
Despite the promise, the cost of such an initiative remains a significant hurdle. A previous study estimated the annual cost of deploying SAI with sulfur dioxide at $18 billion, while a diamond-based approach could escalate to $175 trillion over 65 years. These financial challenges, combined with ethical and environmental concerns, highlight the complexities of adopting geoengineering solutions.
Industrial diamonds
While geoengineering with diamonds remains theoretical, lab-grown diamonds are already making tangible contributions to sustainability and industry. De Beers, which recently abandoned its efforts to be a leader in lab-grown diamond jewelry, has pivoted towards the production of synthetic diamonds for industrial applications through its research arm, Element Six.
Element Six, headquartered in Oxford, England, uses advanced heat technologies to create lab-grown diamonds for industrial use. These synthetic diamonds are critical in industries like mining, drilling, and even emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI).
Siobhán Duffy, CEO of Element Six, highlighted the engineering differences between jewelry-grade diamonds and those used in industry: “When it comes to lab-grown for jewelry, it is very different to the price points in the industrial space because it’s a different proposition and it’s different engineering that underpins your end product,” she told The Times.
Diamonds’ ability to withstand extreme heat has opened new avenues in electronics, especially in high-heat environments such as AI processors. As industries seek more efficient and durable materials, synthetic diamonds offer a solution that could reduce energy waste and improve performance.
The rise of lab-grown diamonds
The growing popularity of lab-grown diamonds, particularly among younger consumers, underscores a broader shift toward sustainability. Gen Z and millennials have embraced lab-grown diamonds for their lower cost and reduced environmental impact compared to mined stones. This trend has challenged traditional players like De Beers, which has struggled to maintain market dominance amidst changing consumer preferences.
Lab-grown diamonds also represent an opportunity for companies to align with global sustainability goals. By reducing the need for intensive mining operations, these diamonds minimize land disruption, water usage, and carbon emissions. For Element Six, this shift has fueled significant growth, with the company emerging as the largest Western supplier of synthetic industrial diamonds.
Challenges and opportunities
Despite their promise, both geoengineering with diamond dust and the industrial use of lab-grown diamonds face considerable challenges. Geoengineering solutions like SAI remain controversial, with critics warning of unforeseen ecological consequences and potential diversion of funding from other climate initiatives. Vattioni acknowledged these concerns, noting that “not doing this research would also be to look away from a potential technology that could at least help to mitigate some risks.”
Meanwhile, Element Six faces competition from China and India, which dominate the lab-grown diamond market. The company must also contend with declining demand in traditional industrial sectors like oil and gas. However, the expanding applications of synthetic diamonds in technology and electronics present a significant growth opportunity.
As the climate crisis intensifies, innovative uses for diamonds could play a crucial role in global mitigation and adaptation strategies. From reflecting sunlight in the stratosphere to powering next-generation technologies, these precious stones are poised to redefine their legacy. While challenges remain, the intersection of science, industry, and sustainability offers a compelling path forward.
But, says Vattioni, “not doing this research would also be to look away from a potential technology that could at least help to mitigate some risks. Not wholesale solutions to mitigate climate change, but SAI and other geoengineering strategies “could buy us some time,” Vattioni said.
“We really run the danger of passing some irreversible climate tipping points and ecological tipping points, and SAI could potentially help to avoid passing these tipping points until we have reached the net zero goal,” he said.
Related on Ethos:
