Hearst Magazines has joined a growing number of fashion-media titans in banning animal fur — aligning with recent moves at Condé Nast and New York Fashion Week.
In a potent show of influence, Hearst Magazines — publisher of Harper’s Bazaar, Esquire, Town & Country, and others — has pledged to cease all promotion of animal fur across its editorial content and advertising. The commitment was delivered in writing to the grassroots group Coalition to Abolish the Fur Trade (CAFT) after five days of protest.
Hearst’s updated “About Us” policy now states: “Across our portfolio of wholly owned global brands, Hearst Magazines prohibits the promotion of animal fur in editorial content and advertising. (Our guidelines recognize defined exceptions and apply to all new business and future content).”
The move aligns Hearst with its already fur-free title, Elle, and marks a clear departure from a past era when fur carried prestige in fashion media. For CAFT, this is a landmark victory. “This is a huge moment for the fashion world. Hearst has shown real leadership by recognizing that fur has no place in modern media. This decision will save countless animals and reflects the growing public demand for compassionate fashion,” CAFT Executive Director Suzie Stork, said in a statement.
Hearst’s concession came only after direct pressure: protests outside its New York headquarters and a volley of emails from activists. With the new policy established, CAFT is already setting its sights on what’s next: “Any brand still selling fur in 2025 should expect massive public outcry. Our next campaign is targeting Rick Owens, and we will bring the same relentless pressure that has pushed so many fashion houses to drop fur for good,” Stork announced.
This announcement is the latest turn in a dramatic pivot within fashion media — a pivot that’s also reshaping the runway. In October, Condé Nast, parent company of Vogue, declared it will no longer feature “new animal fur in editorial content or advertising.” Exceptions apply only in the case of byproducts from indigenous or subsistence practices. That update has reverberated through the fashion world, given Vogue’s long-standing role as the arbiter of style.
Just weeks later, the Council of Fashion Designers of America (CFDA) announced that beginning September 2026, the official schedule of New York Fashion Week (NYFW) — one of the most influential fashion events globally — will ban fur across its runways, promotion, and press channels. The ban prohibits fur derived from animals farmed or trapped for pelts such as mink, fox, rabbit, karakul lamb, chinchilla, coyote, and raccoon dog, while allowing an exemption for fur obtained through Indigenous community subsistence practices. The decision is part of a collaboration with advocacy groups including Humane World for Animals and Collective Fashion Justice.
CFDA CEO Steven Kolb said in a statement: “There is already little to no fur shown at NYFW, but by taking this position, the CFDA hopes to inspire American designers to think more deeply about the fashion industry’s impact on animals.” The official ban now gives designers more than a year to adapt, shaping the Spring/Summer 2027 collections that will debut on the September 2026 runways.
Even so, a handful of luxury houses continue to treat fur as a marker of heritage craftsmanship. Fendi, long synonymous with mink and fox, has not issued a full fur ban, and its couture atelier still produces select made-to-order pieces, positioning them as part of the brand’s historical DNA. LVMH, parent company of Fendi and Louis Vuitton, likewise has not adopted a groupwide fur-free policy.
Louis Vuitton continues to permit fur in certain ready-to-wear and leather goods categories, framing these materials as part of its artisanal lexicon. These holdouts are increasingly unusual: most major houses — including Gucci, Saint Laurent, Burberry, Valentino, and Prada — have eliminated fur entirely, citing ethical concerns and shifting consumer expectations.
The remaining fur-using maisons now occupy a shrinking corner of the luxury landscape, and the pressure is mounting. Several reports show a sustained decline in real fur demand, with the global market contracting sharply since the pandemic and many legacy fur farms closing across Europe. At the same time, high-end consumers have embraced engineered and bio-based alternatives, from KOBA fiber to bio-fur innovations that mimic the loft and warmth of mink without animal origin.
Related on Ethos:
