John Galliano’s two-year deal with Zara has put a name to one of fashion’s most effective and evasive strategies: luxurywashing. From Shein’s celebrity endorsement machine to the data behind fast fashion’s environmental toll, here’s what the headlines leave out.
John Galliano, the man who dressed Nicole Kidman in bias-cut silk and staged runway shows so elaborate they became cultural events — whose work still commands reverence in the halls of the Metropolitan Museum of Art — will spend the next two seasons sifting through Zara’s archives to produce fast fashion collections starting in September 2026. The announcement sent the fashion industry into its most necessary reckoning in years: not just with Galliano’s complicated legacy, or Zara’s global ambitions, but with an insidious practice that has been compounding for decades: luxurywashing.
Luxurywashing is the deployment of prestige — a designer’s name, a celebrity’s face, a couture vocabulary — to launder the reputational damage of unethical or environmentally destructive business models. It is greenwashing’s more glamorous, harder-to-prosecute cousin, and it works because fashion has always trafficked in aspiration, and aspiration is, by design, difficult to fact-check. The Galliano appointment is its most visible manifestation yet, arriving as public scrutiny of fast fashion’s labor and environmental record has never been sharper.
Inditex, Zara’s parent company, framed the Galliano partnership as a creative exploration — an invitation for the designer to “deconstruct and reconfigure” archival pieces into new seasonal expressions. But for a company whose revenue grew by just 1 percent in 2025, the hire reads like calculated repositioning to make Zara look like something else entirely.
Luxury fashion expert Dr. Hakan Karaosman told Fashion United that the deal is “a power move” by Inditex who is trying to “fill a gap in the market for products that offer consumers status at a reasonable price.” It’s notable for what it sidesteps: Zara’s operational reality, which is built on ultra-fast production cycles, synthetic fabric supply chains, and a wholesale business model that is structurally incompatible with the slow, considered values that words like “archive” and “couture” are meant to connote. Fashion watchdog account Diet Prada was more pointed, noting that Galliano’s involvement does not obviously “[outweigh] the damage that businesses like Zara cause.” Unlike luxury houses with deep archives of historically significant garments, Zara’s model is built on ephemerality — stock rotates out in weeks, and the very idea of a Zara “archive” is, in many ways, a contradiction in terms.
Zara’s own sustainability record makes that gap harder to bridge than a designer name alone can manage. Inditex has pledged to reduce emissions by 50 percent by 2030 and reach net zero by 2040, but the trajectory is moving in the wrong direction. In 2024, the company’s greenhouse gas emissions from transport and distribution rose 10 percent to more than 2.6 million metric tons of carbon dioxide — outpacing product volume growth by a factor of two. A Public Eye investigation found that Inditex’s transport emissions jumped 37 percent in fiscal year 2023 alone, driven in large part by the company’s reliance on air freight to shuttle clothing from Asian production centers to its logistics hub in Spain — a practice that H&M Group, by comparison, keeps to under 1 percent of its transport emissions. Good On You, the independent sustainability ratings platform, currently gives Zara an “It’s a Start” rating across both labor and environmental categories, and a “Not Good Enough” score on animal welfare.
The labor picture is similarly unresolved. Inditex has promoted a “Workers at the Centre” strategy that emphasizes living wages and safe workplaces across its supply chain, but there is no public evidence that the company ensures living wages for the majority of its garment workers, and its factory audit results remain unavailable to outside observers. In 2023, nearly 3,000 Bangladeshi garment workers faced criminal charges after protesting the insufficiency of the country’s minimum wage — and labor campaigners accused Inditex of failing to pressure its suppliers to drop those charges.
A catalog of complicity
The Galliano arrangement doesn’t exist in isolation. It sits atop a much older, more sprawling infrastructure of celebrity alignment with fast fashion — one that has been perfected, most visibly, by Shein. The company generated $38 billion in revenue in 2024, a 23 percent increase year-over-year, and has built much of its cultural footprint through strategic star power.
In 2020, celebrities including Katy Perry, Lil Nas X, and Rita Ora headlined Shein Together, a pandemic-era virtual concert streamed through the brand’s app, with appearances by Hailey Bieber, Yara Shahidi, Madelaine Petsch, and others. The following year, Khloé Kardashian served as a judge for Shein’s 100K Challenge design competition, seated alongside Christian Siriano, Law Roach, and Jenna Lyons — giving the brand the visual grammar of a legitimate fashion enterprise. In late 2024, Cardi B posted a sponsored video wearing Shein coats and directing her 165 million Instagram followers to use her promo code.
The backlash to the Cardi B deal was immediate; fans pointed out that the rapper typically wears Hermès and Chanel. Her response was, at least, honest: “If someone is offering me $700,000 dollars [sic] to do a that I don’t got [sic] to put on my Instagram feed, I’m going to do it.” The candor illustrated exactly how the machine operates — celebrities trade credibility and reach for fees that rarely require genuine engagement with what they’re endorsing, or accountability for it.
The legal landscape is beginning to catch up. A 2025 class-action lawsuit named influencers Anastasia Karanikolaou, Cindy Prado, and Bianca Anastasia Arcori alongside Shein, alleging deceptive, undisclosed paid promotions that misled consumers. In 2023, Shein flew a cohort of influencers to its Guangzhou facility for what it presented as a transparent factory tour. The resulting content praised clean conditions and contented workers, only to be dismantled by the Human Rights Foundation, which described the visit as “all fabricated.” Influencer Destene Sudduth, as reported by NPR, told followers that workers she interviewed were “confused and taken back [sic]” by her questions about child labor and lead in clothing, which, for many observers, said everything.
What the numbers say
What celebrity partnerships and designer collaborations are so effective at obscuring is the underlying data. Fashion production accounts for 10 percent of total global carbon emissions annually, roughly equivalent to the output of the entire European Union. Consumers worldwide generate 92 million tonnes of textile waste every year — a figure projected to hit 134 million tonnes by 2030. The average garment is worn just 7 to 10 times before being discarded, a decline of more than 35 percent in 15 years.
Shein’s specific numbers are in a category of their own. The company adds as many as 10,000 new items to its platform per day, with up to 600,000 products available at any given moment at an average price of about $10. According to Earth.org, its carbon emissions rose from 9.17 million metric tons in 2022 to 16.68 million tonnes in 2023 — an 81 percent increase in a single year. Seventy-six percent of Shein’s total fabric is polyester, a synthetic material that sheds microplastics into waterways, and only 6 percent of that polyester is recycled. In third-party audits of more than 3,000 Shein suppliers and subcontractors, 71 percent scored a “C” or lower on the company’s own sustainability scorecard.
In 2025, a BBC investigation found workers at Shein supplier factories regularly putting in 75-hour weeks, with standard shifts running from 8 a.m. well into the evening, and a basic monthly wage of approximately 2,400 yuan — well below the 6,512 yuan the Asia Floor Wage Alliance identifies as a living wage for garment workers. Shein’s own 2023 sustainability report acknowledged two child labor cases within its Chinese supply chain. In September 2024, Italy’s Competition Authority launched a formal investigation into the company’s sustainability claims, citing misleading environmental marketing.
Shein recently published a circularity study drawn from more than 15,000 customers across 21 countries — a strategic communications move for a brand long criticized for low-quality, disposable garments. The findings are deliberately ambiguous: though respondents were Shein customers, questions focused on general clothing habits rather than Shein products specifically, allowing the company to broadcast favorable statistics without making any direct claims about its own inventory. Figures like 55.6 percent of respondents wearing certain clothes more than 50 times could apply to any brand in their wardrobe. Unlike similar research published by Zalando and Vestiaire Collective, Shein’s study maps with notable precision onto the company’s most persistent criticisms — while carefully avoiding any direct response to them.
The collaboration economy
Luxurywashing didn’t begin with the Galliano announcement. The template was arguably drafted in 2004, when Karl Lagerfeld partnered with H&M and, in doing so, legitimized the high-low collaboration as a permanent industry staple. What followed was hundreds of collaborations, each one normalizing the next, until the practice became so standard that questioning it started to feel naïve.
Tony Wang, founder of luxury consultancy Office of Applied Strategy, told Business of Fashion that partnerships “should feel like [they’re] enhancing the world of the brand, not diluting it.” The more pressing question isn’t whether the Galliano collaboration enhances Zara’s world — it clearly will, at least in the first wave of media coverage — but whether it diminishes his, and more importantly, whether it asks the consumer to divorce aesthetic excitement from ethical accountability.
The fashion industry has spent years developing a vocabulary for this evasion: conscious collections, responsible sourcing, circular design. Luxurywashing adds a more sophisticated layer of abstraction, replacing environmental language with aesthetic language. Instead of claiming sustainability, the brand simply claims to be worth caring about — and hires someone whose work genuinely is to make that argument. Silvia Pellegrino’s assessment, in the end, may be the most precise summary of the arrangement: “Zara is willing to pay Galliano for his name, but not enough,” she told Fashion United. “Today we talk so much about dynamics, profits, and strategy when discussing fashion, and yet we forget that fashion is primarily about something more powerful that cannot be controlled or contained on a spreadsheet: creativity, art.”
Related on Ethos:
