Lululemon’s latest recycling deal, Europe’s policy-powered polyester pivot, and U.S. EPR rollouts signal a potential breakthrough for textile circularity, but only if bold investments and regulatory alignment follow.
Recycling may be broken, but it is not abandoned. Even as the global circularity rate for materials plunged to just 6.9 percent this year — down from 9.1 percent in 2018, according to a new report — textile innovators are quietly redrawing the boundaries of what recycling can mean in the fashion world.
Among them is Lululemon, which recently announced that it would source nearly 20 percent of its fiber mix from materials recycled from old garments and manufacturing waste by 2035. The company has signed a decade-long offtake agreement with Australian startup Samsara Eco, which specializes in enzymatic recycling enhanced by artificial intelligence. The partnership, revealed June 11, marks one of the most significant commercial commitments yet to a next-generation textile recycler, offering a glimmer of momentum in a space littered with bankrupt ventures and shelved promises.
“Scaling circular materials requires bold partnerships and a shared commitment to rethinking how our industry operates,” Ted Dagnese, Lululemon’s chief supply chain officer, said in a statement.
The Vancouver-based athleisure giant is aiming for 75 percent “preferred materials” by 2025 — those that are either recycled or meet strict ethical and environmental standards. That’s a notable leap from 47 percent in 2023 and just 27 percent in 2020. Samsara Eco’s enzymatic process, which breaks polymers into
The startup has already delivered a proof of concept: a peach-hued Swiftly top made from recycled nylon and a purple Anorak jacket reengineered from old polyester fibers.
Unlike earlier mechanical recycling techniques that degrade fibers with each cycle, Samsara Eco’s technology maintains structural integrity, enabling multiple loops through the supply chain. “We can deal with polyester cotton,” said Paul Riley, CEO of Samsara Eco. “We don’t have an issue with the mixed nature of those garments; we can separate those quite comfortably.” The company’s patented low-heat, low-pressure process is designed to be energy efficient and cost-competitive. But Riley remains blunt about scale: the company’s target of processing 1.5 million tons of plastic waste by 2030 represents just 0.37 percent of the world’s annual plastic output.
Still, the commitment from Lululemon, which also backs synthetic biology firms like ZymoChem and carbon-capture yarn projects with LanzaTech, signals that material science is no longer peripheral to brand identity — it’s foundational. And yet, this same company has nearly tripled its emissions since 2019, while still using virgin synthetics for 67 percent of its product line. Environmental watchdog Stand.earth gave Lululemon a C grade on its latest Fossil Fuel Fashion scorecard, citing improved investments in recycled fibers but a lack of urgency elsewhere.
Virgin materials continue to rise
Meanwhile, global extraction continues to climb. According to the recent Circularity Gap Report, conducted by Deloitte and Circle Economy Foundation, material extraction has tripled over the last 50 years and surpassed the 100 billion-ton mark. If left unchecked, it is projected to rise another 60 percent by 2060. The material footprint in wealthy countries averages 24 tons per person per year — six times higher than in developing nations, even though the wealthiest economies house less than one-fifth of the world’s population. This imbalance, the report notes, is not just environmental — it reflects and reinforces systemic inequality.
“The report explains pragmatically the causes of the global decline of the circularity metric. Basically, it is about the fact that the growing effort to manage waste ‘cleanly’ doesn’t keep pace with the world’s economies continuing to intensively exploit virgin resources. On the other hand, it becomes clear that the ability and responsibility to reverse this trend lies in the alignment and cooperation between governments and industries. The change starts with regulation and incentives to support waste collection and recycling, so that secondary materials become accessible both from a supply chain and price perspective,” said Adrian Teampau, Director, Indirect Tax and Circular Economy at Deloitte Romania. “There are challenges in the process, but benefits exist as well, and our experience in assisting clients with transforming their operations towards circularity tells us that these benefits appear relatively quickly. Among them, I would mention first cost optimization, environmental footprint reduction and, at least as importantly, increased engagement among employees and customers.”
Teampau’s colleague, Ovidiu Popescu, who leads Deloitte’s energy and sustainability practice in Southeast Europe, emphasized that scaling circularity should not be viewed as a burden for large corporations alone. “The figures presented in the successive editions of the Circularity Gap Report are very convincingly grounding the idea that the sustainable transition cannot be seen as a backup plan, nor as an obligation that concerns large companies rather than smaller market players. Even less should we view it as an impediment to growth. On the contrary, economies and societies are changing at an unprecedented pace, and pursuing ESG criteria within the business gives an ability to build predictability and resilience, regardless of the profile and size of the organization.”
Can policy head off a materials collapse?
As brands grapple with the cost and complexity of building closed-loop systems, policymakers are stepping in with extended producer responsibility, or EPR — laws that shift accountability for textile waste onto the companies that create it, forcing them to bankroll recycling, repair, and reuse infrastructure that until now has largely fallen to municipalities or consumers.
Europe is already moving toward a more policy-anchored solution. A new report from London-based consultancy Systemiq outlines a roadmap for scaling polyester depolymerization across the continent. The findings suggest that recycled polyester could soon reach price parity with virgin polyester if policymakers align infrastructure investment, brand offtake agreements, and recycled-content regulations. Today, recycled polyester made from post-consumer textiles is estimated to be 2.6 times more expensive than virgin alternatives sourced from Asia. That gap, the report argues, could be closed through a combination of extended producer responsibility fees, energy price reductions, and green premiums paid by brands.
“Europe can drive and achieve a textile recycling breakthrough,” said Sophie Herrmann, a partner at Systemiq. “But without leadership from policymakers, the system will remain stuck in pilot mode as the business case does not work.”
In the United States, California is leading with its own legislation. The state’s new extended producer responsibility law for textiles — passed in 2023 and now moving into implementation — sets the stage for a first-of-its-kind statewide framework. “A lot of our education has been focused on ensuring producers of covered products are aware of their responsibilities and opportunities,” said Joanne Brasch, the council’s director of advocacy and outreach.
At the local level, pilot programs are already expanding. The Solid Waste Authority of Central Ohio is testing drop-off and collection infrastructure in collaboration with Goodwill and Leigh Fibers, which will recycle the materials into automotive insulation and other products. Union County, New Jersey, has already diverted over 23,000 pounds of textiles from landfills this year through its drop-off network with Helpsy. And Ridwell, a residential subscription recycling service, is asking customers to pre-sort clothing to improve processing outcomes for rewearable and recyclable textiles.
Whether driven by enzymatic innovation, systemic regulation, or citizen-level shifts, textile recycling is advancing on multiple fronts. What remains uncertain is whether this momentum will be fast — or coordinated — enough to reverse the steady decline in global circularity.
Related on Ethos:
