Parents are rethinking synthetics as microplastic risks rise, turning to cotton and recycled wool — natural fibers that keep kids comfortable without leaving plastic behind.
Laundering that tiny fleece jacket, the toddler sweater, or synthetic activewear may seem harmless enough, but each wash can shed microplastic fibers that slip past filters, infiltrate waterways, and ultimately reenter human exposure pathways. Recent research increasingly spotlights clothing as a dominant channel for microplastic pollution, and parenting decisions are quietly evolving under its influence.
A KQED report highlights that “washing fleece releases plastic fibers that flow away from our house … end up in the natural world. It ultimately returns to us — to our kids — in the form of polluted water, food, and air.” In fact, it is estimated that the average person globally ingests up to the weight of a credit card in microplastics each week, with links drawn between ingestion and respiratory, digestive, and reproductive harm.
Tracey Woodruff, who researches reproductive health and environmental exposure at UCSF, told KQED that scientists have gotten used to saying, “We don’t know for sure if microplastics are harming us.” But, she says, “we’re now at the point where we have enough evidence to act … It is really mind-blowing how much comes from textiles.”
A 2025 review in the journal Textiles estimates 35 to 40 percent of ocean microplastic and nanoplastic pollution originates from synthetic fibers in clothing and textiles. When garments degrade — during wear, friction, or laundering — they release microplastic particles that wastewater systems often cannot fully trap.
The Textiles review notes that these particles bypass treatment systems and accumulate in human tissues, including lungs, liver, brain, and blood. In parallel, research in Sustainability argues that assessments based solely on production phases omit a critical component: the use phase; laundering, fiber shedding, and lifespan vastly influence environmental impact.
Even luxury labels are not immune. A toddler boy sweater from Jacadi Paris, prized for its softness and tailored cut, might still blend fibers to maintain durability and elasticity — qualities that contribute to fiber shedding when washed or worn.
Washing synthetic clothes, such as fleec,e releases thousands of microfibers. A single load of fleece can shed fibers equivalent, in mass, to several plastic bags. Because most home washing machines lack filters for microfibers, a significant portion of that pollution enters rivers, lakes, and eventually oceans.
In response, some scientists urge a pragmatic approach over total elimination. Megan Schwarzman of UC Berkeley’s Center for Green Chemistry, says that individual prized objects (like a stuffy or a favorite sweater) are not the things to try to eliminate.”
She says we do a disservice when we suggest that people can solve the problem by buying different things. “It’s really putting public pressure on policymakers, [large-scale] purchasers, brands, and manufacturers is what creates change.”
Schwarzman also notes that fleece contributes only a fraction of total exposure, and other sources — like degraded tires or architectural paint — are likely more significant relative contributors.
She and others advise a hierarchy of mitigation: prioritize non-plastic contact in kitchenware and food storage (e.g. avoid microwaving in plastic, use glass or metal), then reduce synthetic clothing where feasible.
Natural fibers are reemerging as a counterpoint to the synthetic saturation of modern wardrobes. Cotton, particularly organic and minimally processed, remains one of the most breathable, low-shedding fabrics available. According to Textile Exchange’s 2024 Material Change Index, organic cotton production now accounts for roughly one percent of the global cotton supply, but its market share is projected to double within five years as brands phase out virgin polyester in favor of biodegradable alternatives.
Unlike synthetics, cotton fibers break down naturally, reducing their persistence in soil and water. New finishing techniques, such as low-water dyeing and enzymatic softening, are also lowering cotton’s environmental footprint, making it a practical choice for children’s wear that still feels soft and durable.
Recycled wool has likewise reentered design conversations once dominated by polyester fleece. Italian mills, including Re.Verso and Prato-based Manteco, are recovering pre-consumer and post-industrial wool waste to spin fine yarns that rival virgin fibers in hand and warmth.
Because wool fibers are longer and heavier, they shed significantly fewer particles during wear or wash cycles, and studies have shown they release almost no microplastics into wastewater streams. For parents seeking alternatives to fleece, a recycled wool cardigan or brushed-cotton pullover offers comfort and a smaller ecological footprint.
Some practical guidelines include favoring secondhand synthetic garments, which have shed their most volatile fibers). Wash new synthetic items gently, in cold water, and line dry rather than tumble dry. Use a mesh laundry bag or install a microplastic filter for the washing machine. Rotate between synthetic and natural-fiber pieces to limit continuous exposure from one source. Layer fall toddler clothes for warmth and fiber selection as well.
Experts agree that the larger shift must be systemic. Schwarzman warns that suggesting individuals buy “greener” is helpful but won’t suffice; pressure must be exerted on manufacturers, brands, and policy. Textile regulation lags plastic packaging legislation — for instance, California’s SB 54 targets packaging, but textile regulation remains nascent.
Parenting in 2025 may now include asking whether that soft synthetic sweater — or its synthetic lining — was worth the invisible thread it contributes to microplastic exposure.
Related on Ethos:
