The 2026 Oscars nominees read like a who’s who list of filmmakers and actors doubling as advocates engaged with climate, human rights, labor, and social justice causes.
The films shaping the 2026 Oscars race are being carried by artists whose public profiles extend far beyond their onscreen work. This year’s nominations are led by Sinners, Ryan Coogler’s genre‑driven drama, which earned a record 16 Academy Award nominations, followed closely by Paul Thomas Anderson’s One Battle After Another. The year’s most recognized projects share not just awards momentum, but a creative ecosystem shaped by filmmakers and performers whose careers intersect with environmental advocacy, human rights, labor equity, and structural critique.
Across directing and acting categories, many of this year’s nominees have sustained public records of engagement that run parallel to their artistic output, often grounded in long‑term commitments rather than campaign‑style activism.
Climate, conservation, and environmental responsibility
Leonardo DiCaprio’s nomination for One Battle After Another continues a dual career defined by acting and environmental advocacy. For more than two decades, DiCaprio has funded and supported conservation initiatives through his foundation, focusing on biodiversity protection, climate research, and Indigenous land rights. His executive producer role on We Are Guardians, a documentary examining Indigenous‑led efforts to protect the Amazon rainforest, positioned environmental preservation as inseparable from land sovereignty and community survival. He later co‑produced Yanuni, which follows Indigenous activist Juma Xipaia’s fight against illegal mining in Brazil.
At the London premiere of One Battle After Another, DiCaprio acknowledged Robert Redford’s influence, describing him as someone whose “unwavering commitment to protecting our planet and inspiring change has set a standard.” The comment reflected a throughline that has defined DiCaprio’s public life as much as his filmography.
Chloé Zhao’s nomination for Hamnet similarly extends a body of work shaped by environmental and economic context. Across her earlier films, Zhao has centered individuals living under conditions of labor instability and geographic displacement, often framing landscape as a determining force rather than a backdrop. In interviews, she has described her interest in people operating at the margins of economic systems, where environmental exposure and precarity overlap.
Justice, equity, and institutional accountability
Michael B. Jordan’s Best Actor nomination for Sinners accompanies a public record of engagement with equity and industry reform. Through his production company, Outlier Society, Jordan launched the #ChangeHollywood initiative in 2020 in partnership with Color Of Change, calling for enforceable commitments to racial equity in hiring, investment, and storytelling. “This roadmap is just the beginning of the journey to racial justice,” he said at the time. “We are all accomplices in the fight to transform Hollywood, and we invite content creators and industry leaders to join us in working together to #ChangeHollywood,” he told The Hollywood Reporter. “We look forward to including a variety of voices in doing what we do best: telling authentic stories, bringing people together, partnering with influential artists, and changing the rules of the game.”
Coogler’s work on Sinners continues a career‑long focus on institutional harm and cultural memory. From Fruitvale Station onward, Coogler has described filmmaking as a means of honoring lived experience rather than abstraction, positioning genre as a tool for confronting history rather than escaping it.
Teyana Taylor, nominated in a supporting category for One Battle After Another, has repeatedly used her platform to speak out on police violence and racial injustice, including public participation in Black Lives Matter protests and direct criticism of systemic policing failures. Her engagement places her among the nominees for whom advocacy is not separate from creative identity, but an extension of it.
Emma Stone’s nomination for Bugonia places her within a growing cohort of actors engaging in collective political action. In 2024, Stone was among more than one thousand film professionals who signed a pledge organized by Film Workers for Palestine, committing to boycott Israeli film institutions the group described as “implicated in genocide and apartheid against the Palestinian people.” Reporting from the Associated Press noted that the pledge emphasized institutional accountability over individual targeting and drew explicit parallels to the cultural boycott used during the anti‑apartheid movement in South Africa. Stone has also been publicly involved in Time’s Up, aligning her advocacy with labor protections and gender equity.
Performance as social inquiry
Beyond the most visible advocacy figures, several acting nominees are known for work that treats social fracture as a central dramatic concern. Jessie Buckley’s performances have repeatedly examined psychological pressure, gendered expectation, and moral ambiguity without offering narrative resolution. Her roles often situate individual unraveling within broader social constraints, particularly around care, labor, and power.
Renate Reinsve’s collaborations with Joachim Trier in Sentimental Value continue a body of work that interrogates class, emotional labor, and creative identity within late capitalism. Trier has described his films as studies in social inheritance, examining how intimacy is shaped by cultural and economic expectations.
Kate Hudson’s public engagement has taken a quieter, philanthropic form. She has served as a Goodwill Ambassador for the United Nations World Food Programme, focusing on global hunger relief and food access, and has long supported the Goldie Hawn Foundation’s MindUP program, which centers on children’s mental health and social-emotional learning in school settings. Her involvement reflects a strand of engagement present among this year’s nominees that centers on sustained nonprofit participation rather than public-facing advocacy campaigns, particularly around food security and mental well-being.
Wagner Moura, nominated for The Secret Agent, has spoken publicly about authoritarianism and democratic erosion in Brazil, drawing connections between political normalization and cultural silence. His career choices frequently place him in narratives that confront state power and institutional violence, extending those concerns beyond national borders.
Benicio Del Toro and Sean Penn, both nominated in supporting categories for One Battle After Another, bring longer histories of politically engaged work to the field. Del Toro’s career has repeatedly returned to stories about imperial power, corruption, and moral compromise, while Penn’s humanitarian work through disaster relief organization CORE has positioned him as one of the few actors of his generation to consistently pair screen work with on‑the‑ground engagement during global crises.
Beyond the stage
DiCaprio has long articulated a view of public responsibility that bridges his work as an actor with his engagement beyond film. Speaking at a United Nations climate summit in 2014, after being named a U.N. Messenger of Peace focused on climate change, DiCaprio addressed the tendency to distance real-world crises through abstraction.
“I play fictitious characters often solving fictitious problems. I believe that mankind has looked at climate change in that same way,” he said. “As if pretending that climate change wasn’t real would somehow make it go away, but I think we all know better than that now….None of this is rhetoric, and none of it is hysteria. It is fact.”
Jordan has framed his engagement in similarly pragmatic terms. When named to Time’s 100 list, Jordan described his responsibility as access. “If I can do a bit of that hard work — if I can afford them more opportunity so they can stand on my shoulders and be a little bit taller — I think I’m doing my job.”
Related on Ethos:
