Reformation’s IPO came with an $890 million valuation, and it’s testing whether a brand built on a “buy less”philosophy can satisfy public markets that demand it sell more.
For years, a Reformation dress has been the guilt-free version of wanting something new: the floral slip bought for the wedding or the going-out piece chosen partly because the tag sewn inside it keeps score. Each garment lists the pounds of carbon dioxide and the gallons of water it saved against a conventional version of itself, tallied by a company tool called RefScale, and the brand’s best-known line finishes the thought on hangtags and in Instagram ads. “Being naked is the #1 most sustainable option. We’re #2.” Taylor Swift wears the dresses. So do Jennifer Aniston and a decade of women who wanted the jeans or the skirt that came with a clear conscience.
On July 30, Reformation rang the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange and began trading under the ticker REF. The prospectus that got it there runs hundreds of pages in the language securities lawyers prefer, and it still made room to name the celebrities who wear the clothes in the same wink as the hangtags. What it promised investors was more of everything those hangtags gently discourage: more dresses, more countries, and more quarters like the 20 straight it had already strung together, each one up by double digits.
“We needed to build not only a sustainable business but a business that can fund itself and its expansion,” Hali Borenstein, Reformation’s chief executive, said at the National Retail Federation’s Big Show in 2024 in conversation with Fortune. A company that sells the idea of buying less now owes its shareholders more items sold.
The growth behind Reformation’s $890million IPO
Reformation carried strong numbers to market. Net revenue reached $507.1 million for the fiscal year that ended in December 2025, up from $438.2 million, and first-quarter revenue this year rose 30.4 percent to $112.3 million. The shares priced at $15 and raised $210.9 million, valuing the company at about $890 million. Permira, the private equity firm that bought a majority stake in 2019, when Reformation was doing an estimated $150 million in sales, finally had its exit. Revenue has compounded at about 34 percent a year since 2015, by the filing’s math.
Reformation counted 1.1 million active direct-to-consumer customers at the end of March; they came back, and paid full price when they did, often enough to make next year’s revenue forecastable. The footprint underneath that number is still small, though. The company ran 70 stores across the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and France at the listing, held to 15 wholesale accounts across 142 doors, and shipped online to more than 150 countries, room to grow in every direction at once. About 90 percent of its revenue still comes straight from those stores and its website rather than wholesale, by the filing’s count.
Borenstein has been specific about where that growth comes from. Europe first, where she has said the customer is louder about sustainability than in the United States; then wholesale, after years of selling almost entirely through its own stores and site; then categories, the denim, shoes, and relaunched swimwear that have already turned a dress label into something wider. Dresses made up about 65 percent of sales in 2019. By 2024 they were closer to 35 percent.
The same filing that promises expansion also shows its price. Net profit fell to $12.6 million in 2025 from about $33 million a year earlier, and gross margin narrowed 360 basis points to 60.2 percent under tariffs levied through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Shipping, returns, and store payroll all land on a company that sells mostly straight to the customer, and they land hardest in the quarters a public company most wants a fatter margin to show.
What Reformation’s ‘buy less’ branding actually sells
RefScale tracks the footprint of every style, the company has pledged to run circular by 2030, and roughly 80 percent of its direct-to-consumer sales happen at full price, with markdowns held to twice a year. All of it sits behind a slogan that tells the shopper the greenest option in the store is the door. By the brand’s own accounting, the dress is the runner-up and the empty cart is the winner. Reformation has spent 15 years selling the runner-up extremely well, and it built half a billion dollars in revenue on the trade. Under Permira, that was a private company’s strategy. Under a ticker that reprices it every afternoon on how much more of the runner-up it can move, it is the terms of the deal.
“When we set out to bring sustainable fashion to everyone, part of that was recognizing we had to be profitable,” Borenstein told Fortune. The sustainability she means has never asked the customer to leave empty-handed; it asks her to trade up, to put the better-made dress in the cart instead of the disposable one, which is a thing a company can sell to more people every year. Borenstein has said the mission sometimes has to win outright. “You do have to make decisions at times where it’s not about business. You have to put your mission first,” she said. Those were choices a private company could make on its own timetable, in front of a single owner. A public one makes them in front of investors who put their money on the growth.
The degrowth paradox Wall Street won’t price
There is a word for the bind Reformation just signed up for: degrowth. It’s the argument that a finite planet cannot underwrite an economy built on selling ever-larger volumes. It has moved from the edges of fashion research toward the middle of it, and it points straight at a brand like this one. “If the goal is to try to slow down consumption, which is a very unpleasant message for many people, it is necessary to figure out how to separate ‘making money’ from ‘selling more,'” Kate Fletcher, the London College of Fashion researcher who coined the term slow fashion, told Modefica in 2020. Reformation’s IPO fuses the two things Fletcher wants separated and hands the weld to shareholders with a vote. Buying better, in her account, is not the same as buying less. “Investing in one product doesn’t prevent you from consuming another product, because people have an infinite ability to continue consuming, consuming, and consuming,” she added.
The industry’s own sustainability chiefs have circled the same problem for years without solving it. “Is value only growth and volume, or is it how we create value to both the supply chain and the workers, the artisans out there, to consumers and, of course, also to stakeholders and shareholders?” Morten Lehmann, then chief sustainability officer at the Global Fashion Agenda, asked in Forbes. Zalando’s then-sustainability director, Kate Heiny, called it the Holy Grail. “[F]or us [it] is the decoupling of our economic growth from our social and environmental impacts,” she said. No one in the field has reported finding it.
A few labels have tried to build the separation into the way they operate rather than the way they advertise. Asket, the Swedish menswear brand, caps its own growth on purpose. “we’re aiming to grow at a maximum of 60 percent per year in order to make sure that we do things right,” cofounder August Bard Bringéus told Forbes. It’s a line no company writes into an S-1. Reformation has gone the other way, trading the private company that could set its own speed for a public one whose speed is set on the floor of the exchange.
Betting against a retreating industry
The bet arrives as the rest of the field backs away from the same promises. In May, Everlane, another millennial label that had sold shoppers a clean path to net zero, was bought by Shein, a match its own customers mourned in the replies. Ralph Lauren walked back its net-zero target this year. Roughly two-thirds of major brands are behind the 2030 emissions goals they wrote for themselves. Most of the industry is loosening its climate commitments where few people are watching. Reformation has strapped its own to an earnings call every 90 days.
What Borenstein has taken public is the experiment the rest of the sector keeps declining to run. The RefScale math is real; the full-price discipline is real; the charge of greenwashing does not fit the numbers. What Reformation has agreed to do, in the open and on a clock, is to grow at the rate the market rewards while continuing to mean what its clothes say about buying less. The verdict will not come in a press release. It will come in the next earnings report, and the one after that. Reformation’s most famous line still says the most sustainable dress is the one nobody buys. Its shareholders, though, are most certainly counting on the opposite.
Related on Ethos:
