As anti-wrinkle procedures and treatments become routine, attention is shifting toward safety, regulation, and trust.
Fine lines — across the forehead, around the eyes, in the small creases around the mouth — can start to appear by the early thirties. Data from the American Academy of Dermatology shows that visible facial lines often begin forming in the late twenties, driven by collagen loss that accelerates at roughly one percent per year after around age 20. The response to slow the appearance of these lines and wrinkles has been swift and increasingly normalized. Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures are now part of routine self-care for a broad swath of consumers — no longer a niche or extreme choice.
According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, more than 25 million minimally invasive cosmetic procedures were performed in the United States in 2023, with wrinkle-focused treatments dominating that total. Injectables alone accounted for over nine million treatments, making them among the most commonly sought medical aesthetic services nationwide. The growth is not confined to one age group. While patients in their 40s and 50s remain core consumers, the fastest growth continues among patients in their late 20s and 30s, many of whom frame treatment as preventative rather than corrective.
“There’s been a dramatic shift from people viewing these things as a form of cosmetic surgery or a medical thing to a form of grooming,” celebrity cosmetic dermatologist Dr. Paul Jarrod Frank, founder of Manhattan’s PFRANKMD, told The New York Post.
“People look at it as a form of grooming, like getting their hair done, like getting their nails done.”
Injectable treatments that soften lines without surgery
Botox (botulinum toxin) remains the most widely performed cosmetic procedure in the United States. In 2023, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons reported nearly 10 million Botox injections. The treatment works by temporarily relaxing targeted facial muscles that contribute to expression lines. Results typically become visible within several days and last approximately three to four months, making it a recurring maintenance choice rather than a one-time intervention.
Dermatologists have increasingly emphasized moderation and anatomical precision rather than frozen results — a movement that looks natural at rest reflects a broader industry recalibration away from overtly obvious outcomes. That philosophy has helped normalize injectables among patients who previously resisted them on aesthetic grounds.
Dermal fillers, most commonly formulated with hyaluronic acid, address a different dimension of facial aging: volume loss. Rather than targeting muscle activity, fillers restore fullness to areas such as the cheeks, nasolabial folds, lips, and under-eye hollows. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons estimates that more than 5.3 million dermal filler procedures were performed in 2023, with usage increasing steadily year over year. Depending on the formulation and placement, results can last anywhere from six months to two years.
In interviews with Allure, board-certified dermatologists have emphasized that filler outcomes are highly dependent on injector expertise and conservative dosing. The prevailing guidance centers on structural support and subtle contouring rather than visible augmentation, a shift that mirrors patient demand for results that register as well-rested rather than altered.
Laser skin resurfacing and energy-based treatments
For patients seeking texture refinement alongside wrinkle reduction, laser skin resurfacing remains one of the most effective non-surgical options. These treatments use concentrated light energy to remove damaged surface layers while simultaneously stimulating collagen production in the deeper dermis. The American Society for Dermatologic Surgery reports that laser and light-based procedures consistently rank among the top five non-injectable cosmetic treatments performed annually in the United States.
Outcomes vary depending on laser type and treatment intensity. Ablative lasers typically deliver more dramatic results with longer recovery periods, while non-ablative options offer subtler improvements with minimal downtime. Patients increasingly opt for a series of lower-intensity treatments rather than a single aggressive session, favoring gradual change that integrates easily into daily life.
Radiofrequency-based technologies such as Profound RF operate differently but address similar concerns. By delivering controlled heat to deeper skin layers, these treatments stimulate collagen, elastin, and hyaluronic acid production from within. Clinical studies published have indicated that radiofrequency microneedling can produce measurable tightening and wrinkle reduction lasting up to two years in properly selected patients. The appeal lies in its balance of longevity and minimal downtime, with most sessions completed in under an hour.
Microneedling and chemical peels as ongoing maintenance
Not all wrinkle-focused treatments rely on injectables or energy devices. Microneedling has become a widely adopted option for patients seeking collagen stimulation without altering facial movement or volume. The procedure creates controlled micro-injuries that activate the skin’s natural repair processes, gradually improving fine lines, texture, and firmness. According to the American Academy of Dermatology, microneedling is now one of the most requested in-office procedures among patients under 40.
Chemical peels, long considered a legacy treatment, have also seen renewed interest as formulations become more customizable and recovery times more manageable. Superficial and medium-depth peels can reduce fine lines, uneven pigmentation, and dullness by accelerating cellular turnover. Dermatologists have noted that patients increasingly incorporate peels into regular skincare regimens rather than viewing them as corrective interventions reserved for visible damage.
Both treatments function best as part of a long-term strategy rather than a single solution. When spaced appropriately and overseen by licensed professionals, they offer cumulative benefits that support skin health alongside more targeted procedures.
What experts say about anti-wrinkle procedure safety
As wrinkle-smoothing treatments have become routine, public health agencies and professional medical organizations have begun addressing that shift more directly, particularly as demand accelerates.
In late 2023 and into 2024, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued health alerts related to adverse events linked to improperly administered or counterfeit Botox products, reinforcing the distinction between the treatment itself and the conditions under which it is delivered. The alerts underscored that complications were tied not to Botox as a category, but to unlicensed providers, incorrect dosing, or products sourced outside regulated medical supply chains.
“Unapproved and misbranded Botox products carry serious health risks,” said FDA commissioner Dr. Marty Makary in a statement. “Today we’re taking action to protect American consumers and prevent online entities from selling these dangerous products.”
Professional organizations have echoed that emphasis on medical oversight. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons and the American Academy of Dermatology have both stressed that, as minimally invasive procedures become more common, they should still be treated as medical interventions rather than cosmetic commodities. In its most recent procedural reporting, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons noted that injectables now account for the majority of aesthetic treatments performed in the United States, a scale that has made provider credentials and product traceability more visible concerns for patients. And, it notes, the normalization of these procedures should reshape how consumers evaluate not just the outcomes, but the industry’s infrastructure.
What to look for when choosing a new anti-wrinkle treatment provider
Medical experts consistently emphasize that outcomes and safety depend less on the procedure itself and more on who is performing it and how products are sourced. Dermatologists and plastic surgeons point to licensing, training, and transparency as the clearest signals of quality care.
Providers should be board-certified in dermatology or plastic surgery, or operate directly under the supervision of one, and should be able to clearly explain what product is being used, where it was sourced, and why it is appropriate for a specific area of the face.
Medical settings that treat injectables as healthcare rather than a cosmetic add-on — complete with consultations, informed consent, and follow-up protocols — are consistently cited by professional organizations as the safest environments for treatment. This distinction has become increasingly important as public health agencies have warned that complications are most often linked not to Botox itself, but to unlicensed providers or improperly sourced products rather than regulated medical supply chains.
“If you can get a referral from someone you trust and like the way they look, that’s very helpful,” Ginille Brown, a licensed cosmetic nurse practitioner, told Ebony. “Check their reputation, read reviews, look at before and after photos from their patients, and read what their patients have said,” Brown says. “Read reviews on the facility and their background. Ensure that the person providing the services is appropriately qualified.”
Related on Ethos:
